- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Malaria prevalence among patients with acute undifferentiated fever in secondary hospitals in India
© Haanshuus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Published: 22 September 2014
The World Health Organization reported approximately one million malaria cases and 500 deaths in India in 2012 based on national surveillance data. Estimated number of deaths range from 20,000 to 200,000. The aim of this study was to identify the malaria prevalence among patients with acute undifferentiated fever in rural hospitals in India.
Materials and methods
During April 2011-November 2012, 1564 patients aged >5 years were included in a larger fever study from seven secondary hospitals in India located in Assam (Tezpur), Bihar (Raxaul), Chhattisgarh (Mungeli), Maharashtra (Ratnagiri), Andhra Pradesh (Anantapur) and Tamil Nadu (Oddanchatram and Ambur). Routine microscopy, genus-specific mitochondrial PCR and the rapid immunochromatographic test (RDT) Parahit Total™ (Span Diagnostics Ltd, Surat, India) were performed. Species-specific 18S PCR or sequencing was performed on genus PCR positive samples. Samples with discordancy between PCR and RDT were retested by PCR from the extraction step. PCR was considered as gold standard.
EDTA blood for PCR was available from 1416 patients and 19% were malaria PCR positive. The prevalence ranged from lowest 6% in Oddanchatram (South India) to highest 35% in Ratnagiri (West India). P. falciparum single infection was detected in 46%, 38% had P. vivax, and 11% mixed infections with P. falciparum and P. vivax. P. malariae was detected in 5%. Compared with PCR, the sensitivity of the RDT was 24% and specificity 99%. The sensitivity of microscopy was 29% and specificity 98%. A trend of incorrectly diagnosing P. falciparum as P. vivax by microscopy was found.
Our findings support that malaria is an important differential diagnosis in acute undifferentiated fever in all parts of India, and PCR identified a high level of submicroscopic malaria. The very low sensitivity of the RDT emphasizes the importance of choosing a test with high sensitivity, for which WHO’s validation of RDTs should be used.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.