Table 2 Correlation of numbers of female Anopheles gambiae complex caught by alternative traps with reference collection methods, pooling data from all experiments in which simultaneously data for each pair was collected
From: A new tent trap for sampling exophagic and endophagic members of the Anopheles gambiae complex
| Â | Alternative collection methods | versus CDC-light trap reference method | versus human landing catch reference method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This study | Â | r2 | P | r2 | P |
| Â | Furvela | 0.303 | 0.021 | NA | NA |
| Â | Ifakara A | 0.008 | 0.590 | 0.040 | 0.426 |
| Â | Ifakara B | 0.148 | 0.020 | 0.731 | < 0.001 |
| Â | Light trap | NA | NA | 0.192 | 0.006 |
Ref [14] | Light trap | NA | NA | 0.723 | < 0.001 |
Ref [46] | Light trap | NA | NA | 0.409 | < 0.001 |
Ref [48] | Light trap | NA | NA | 0.476 | < 0.001 |
Ref [15] | Light trap | NA | NA | 0.521 | < 0.001 |