Skip to main content

Table 1 Associations between measures of urbanicity and the household density of mosquitoes stratified by study site

From: Associations between urbanicity and malaria at local scales in Uganda

Urbanicity metric

Exposure categories

Walukuba

Kihihi

Nagongera

HDM (nights of collection)a

IRRb (95 % CI)

P

HDM (nights of collection)a

IRRb (95 % CI)

P

HDM (nights of collection)a

IRRb (95 % CI)

P

Household densityc

≤80

2.08 (327)

0.30 (0.16–0.59)

<0.001

4.68 (2086)

0.68 (0.28–1.64)

0.39

43.3 (2329)

N/A

 

>80

0.90 (1857)

3.58 (166)

None

NDVId

>0.45

1.85 (707)

0.35 (0.21–0.57)

<0.001

4.78 (1704)

0.83 (0.48–1.42)

0.49

41.1 (1660)

1.16 (0.87–1.54)

0.32

≤0.45

0.71 (1477)

4.04 (548)

48.7 (669)

Night-time lights

≤3

1.33 (1526)

0.32 (0.19–0.55)

<0.001

4.60 (2252)

N/A

 

43.3 (2329)

N/A

 

>3

0.49 (658)

None

None

Land cover

≤20 %

1.37 (1265)

0.42 (0.26–0.69)

0.001

Not measured

  

Not measured

  

>20 %

0.68 (919)

Composite scoree

Low

1.37 (1501)

0.28 (0.17–0.48)

<0.001

4.68 (2086)

0.68 (0.28–1.64)

0.39

43.3 (2329)

N/A

 

High

0.44 (683)

3.58 (166)

None

  1. aHousehold density of mosquitoes (number of adult female anophelines caught per nights of collection)
  2. bIncidence rate ratio
  3. cNumber of households within 100 m radius from participating household
  4. dNormalized difference vegetation index
  5. e1 point for each individual urbanicity metric: Walukuba (low = 0–2, high = 3–4), Kihihi and Nagongera (low = 0–1, high = 2)