Skip to main content

Table 11 Summary of mobile migrant population profiles

From: High mobility, low access thwarts interventions among seasonal workers in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: lessons from the malaria containment project

 

Variables

Forest workers

Construction workers

Security personnel

Seasonal workers

Visitors

Profile

 

FW

CW

SP

SW

T

Main activities

Hunting, fishing, logging, non-timber forest products

Dam or road construction, mining

Patrolling

Farming, plantation, chamkar

 

Population type

Local, Mobile, Migrant

Mobile, Migrant

Mobile, Migrant

Local, Mobile, Migrant

Mobile

Forest/malaria exposure

Location from forest

In forest

In forest/forest fringe

In forest

Forest fringe

Forest fringe

Duration of stay in forest

1–4 weeks

1–6 months

Weeks to months?

1–4 weeks

1 week

Forest exposure

High

Medium to high

High

Low to medium

Low

Housing type

Tents, none

Huts, barracks, tents

Huts, barracks, tents

Tents, huts

Wooden or concrete house

Working conditions/access/outreach

Work area

Forest, hills

Forest, hills

Border forest

Foot hills, plains, valleys

 

Work location

Mobile

Fixed

Semi-mobile

Fixed

 

Link/affiliation

None or village for local population

Company

Government

Farm owner/company

None

Main point of contact

None or village for local population

Company

Military base

Farm owner/company

Guest houses/hotels