Skip to main content

Table 4 Correlation and regression analysis of log-transformed indoor and outdoor light trap catch (LTC) with yeast-generated Co2-baited light trap catches (CB-LTC) of Anopheles species in Edo Kontola, Ethiopia 2014

From: Comparison of two adult mosquito sampling methods with human landing catches in south-central Ethiopia

Species

Venue

Correlation coefficient

Regression slope

n

r

p

b

95% CI

t

p

An. arabiensis

IN

39

0.311

0.054

0.287

−0.01 to 0.57

1.992

0.054

OUT

39

−0.073

0.659

0.059

−0.44 to 0.56

0.237

0.814

An. pharoensis

IN

39

0.177

0.281

0.524

0.23 to 0.81

3.711

0.001

OUT

39

−0.105

0.526

0.666

0.29 to 1.03

3.631

0.001

An. ziemanni

IN

39

0.643

<0.001

0.105

−0.09 to 0.31

1.056

0.298

OUT

39

0.852

<0.001

−0.046

−0.17 to 0.08

−0.727

0.472

An. funestus s.l.

IN

39

0.525

0.001

0.082

−0.16 to 0.32

0.679

0.501

OUT

39

0.507

0.001

0.179

−0.06 to 0.41

1.514

0.138

  1. The correlation coefficients show the relationship between log(LTC + 1) and log(CB-LTC + 1). The regression slopes are from regressing relative sampling efficiencies (log(CB-LTC + 1)−log(LTC + 1)) on average abundance ([log(CB-LTC + 1) + log(LTC + 1)]/2)
  2. n sample size, r Pearson’s correlation coefficient, b regression slope, CI confidence interval, t t-test value, p probability value