Skip to main content

Table 2 Residual bioefficacy of used nets in Limbe, Tiko and Buea

From: Physical integrity and residual bio-efficacy of used LLINs in three cities of the South-West region of Cameroon 4 years after the first national mass-distribution campaign

Sites

Brand

No.

KD 60 (±5% CI)

Mortality (±5% CI)

Status

Limbe

Permanet 2.0

192

0.5% (±0.1)

4.1% (±2.8)

Not effective

Olyset net

199

1% (± 1.3)

3% (±2.4)

Not effective

Olyset net

197

4.6% (±2.9)

2.5% (±2.2)

Not effective

Siamdutch

189

29.1% (±6.5)

10.1% (±4.3)

Not effective

Siamdutch

192

13.5% (±4.8)

29.1% (±6.4)

Not effective

Olyset net

177

29.3% (±6.7)

60% (±7.2)

Minimally effective

Olyset net

185

3.2% (±2.5)

3.9% (±2.8)

Not effective

Tiko

Olyset net

103

52.4% (±9.6)

74.8% (8.4)

Minimally effective

Permanet 2.0

115

84.3% (±6.6)

82.6% (6.9)

Optimally effective

Siamdutch

88

60.3% (±10.2)

54.5% (±10.4)

Minimally effective

Olyset net

117

89.7% (±5.5)

81.2% (±7.1)

Optimally effective

Olyset net

117

75.2% (±7.8)

55.6% (±9.0)

Minimally effective

Olyset net

99

93.9% (±4.7)

71.7% (±8.9)

Minimally effective

Olyset net

115

91.3% (±5.2)

83.5% (±6.8)

Optimally effective

Buea

Olyset net

189

4.2% (±2.9)

14.8% (±5.1)

Not effective

Olyset net

138

20.3% (±6.7)

17.4% (±6.3)

Not effective

Olyset net

217

11.5% (±4.2)

14.3% (±4.7)

Not effective

Permanet 2.0

178

4.5% (±3.0)

5.6% (±3.4)

Not effective

Olyset net

178

3.4% (±2.7)

4.5% (±3.0)

Not effective

Permanet 2.0

107

93.5% (±4.7)

75.7% (±8.1)

Minimally effective

  1. No: Number of mosquitoes used to test the net