Skip to main content

Table 3 Malaria microscopy diagnostic performance in malaria low-transmission areas in Kenya, June–December 2013

From: Evaluation of a laboratory quality assurance pilot programme for malaria diagnostics in low-transmission areas of Kenya, 2013

 

Health-facility laboratory personnel

Quality assurance officers

Visit 2

Visit 3

Visit 4

Visit 2

Visit 3

Visit 4

Total slides collected

709

 

408

 

509

 

709

 

408

 

509

 

Slides read by reference laboratory

675

95%

333

82%

509

100%

675

95%

333

82%

509

100%

Reference laboratory

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

 Positive

48

2

8

1

8

7

48

2

8

1

9

6

 Negative

75

550

7

317

9

485

44

581

2

322

7

487

Column total

123

552

15

318

17

492

92

583

10

323

16

493

 

Health-facility laboratory personnel

Quality assurance officers

 

95% CI

 

95% CI

 

95% CI

 

95% CI

 

95% CI

 

95% CI

Sensitivity

96%

86–100%

89%

52–100%

53%

27–79%

96%

86–100%

89%

52–100%

60%

32–84%

Specificity

88%

85–90%

98%

96–99%

98%

97–99%

93%

91–95%

99%

98–100%

99%

97–99%

PPV

39%

30–48%

53%

27–79%

47%

23–72%

52%

42–63%

80%

44–97%

56%

30–80%

NPV

99%

99–100%

99%

98–100%

98%

97–99%

99%

99–100%

99%

98–100%

99%

97–100%

Kappa value

0.50

0.41–0.59

0.66

0.43–0.88

0.48

0.27–0.70

0.64

0.55–0.74

0.84

0.66–1.00

0.57

0.36–0.78

  1. Italic denotes statistically significant improvement from visit 2 to visit 4
  2. CI confidence interval, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value