Skip to main content

Table 5 Perceptions and preferences about spatial repellents after use: effectiveness, rating, and delivery methods

From: Field assessment of a novel spatial repellent for malaria control: a feasibility and acceptability study in Mondulkiri, Cambodia

Questions

Ou Chra

n (%)

Pu Cha

n (%)

Total

n (%)

p value*

Have you had fewer mosquitoes after the instalment of the repellent?

0.001

 Yes—much fewer

3 (10)

38 (66.7)

41 (47.1)

 

 Yes—moderately fewer

15 (50.0)

18 (31.6)

33 (37.9)

 

 Not at all

8 (26.7)

1 (1.7)

9 (10.3)

 

 Do not know/other

4 (13.3)

0 (0.0)

4 (4.6)

 

How would you rate this product overall?

 Very useful

8 (27.6)

22 (38.6)

30 (34.9)

 

 Useful

7 (24.1)

29 (50.9)

36 (41.9)

 

 Not very useful

8 (27.6)

5 (8.8)

13 (15.1)

 

 Useless

2 (6.9)

0 (0.0)

2 (2.3)

 

 Do not know

4 (13.8)

1 (1.8)

5 (5.8)

 

Are you willing to use the repellent again?

0.423

 Yes

28 (93.3)

56 (98.3)

84 (96.6)

 

 No

1 (3.3)

0 (0.0)

1 (1.2)

 

 Do not know

1 (3.3)

1 (1.8)

2 (2.3)

 

Would you prefer spatial repellents over bed nets

0.104

 Yes

8 (26.7)

22 (38.6)

30 (34.5)

 

 No

20 (66.7)

35 (61.4)

55 (63.2)

 

 Do not know

2 (6.7)

0 (0.0)

2 (2.3)

 

What is your preferred purchase channel?

< 0.001

 Health centre/post

16 (55.2)

1 (1.8)

17 (20.0)

 

 Private provider

0 (0.0)

2 (3.6)

2 (2.4)

 

 Market

0 (0.0)

1 (1.8)

1 (1.2)

 

 VMW

8 (27.6)

34 (60.7)

42 (49.4)

 

 Village chief

5 (17.2)

15 (26.8)

20 (23.5)

 

 Do not know

0 (0.0)

3 (5.4)

3 (3.5)

 
  1. * Fisher’s exact test