From: Mosquito net coverage in years between mass distributions: a case study of Tanzania, 2013
District | Socio-economic quintiles (SES) | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poorest | Second poorest | Medium | Wealthier | Wealthiest | ||
Bagamoyo (R) | 66 (15.0) | 77 (17.5) | 114 (26.0) | 126 (28.8) | 55 (12.6) | 438 (100) |
Kinondoni (U) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.7) | 25 (9.3) | 242 (90.0) | 269 (100) |
Kilosa (R) | 124 (27.6) | 80 (17.8) | 85 (18.9) | 118 (26.3) | 42 (9.4) | 449 (100) |
Iringa (U) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (0.9) | 24 (5.4) | 144 (32.1) | 277 (61.7) | 449 (100) |
Mbozi (R) | 49 (10.9) | 125 (27.8) | 162 (36.1) | 95 (21.2) | 18 (4.0) | 449 (100) |
Kahama (R) | 164 (36.6) | 113 (25.2) | 70 (15.6) | 64 (14.3) | 37 (8.3) | 448 (100) |
Geita (R) | 131 (29.2) | 131 (29.2) | 120 (26.7) | 65 (14.5) | 2 (0.5) | 449 (100) |
Musoma (R) | 146 (32.7) | 150 (33.6) | 102 (22.8) | 43 (9.6) | 6 (1.3) | 447 (100) |
Total | 680 (20.0) | 680 (20.0) | 679 (20.0) | 680 (20.0) | 679 (20.0) | 3398 (100) |