Skip to main content

Table 2 Construction details of study child’s sleeping space by socio-economic status of the household head

From: Risk factors associated with house entry of malaria vectors in an area of Burkina Faso with high, persistent malaria transmission and high insecticide resistance

Construction feature of the child’s sleeping space

Socio-economic status of household head*

P value

Poorest

(N = 46)

n (%)

Poor

(N = 44)

n (%)

Middle

(N = 44)

n (%)

Rich

(N = 46)

n (%)

Richest

(N = 47)

n (%)

Roof material

 Non-metal (thatch)

7 (15.2)

9 (20.9)

5 (11.9)

14 (31.8)

11 (24.4)

0.17

 Metal

39 (84.8)

34 (79.1)

37 (88.1)

30 (68.2)

34 (75.6)

Floor material

 Mud

5 (10.9)

17 (39.5)

8 (19.0)

14 (31.8)

13 (28.9)

0.02

 Cement/tile

41 (89.1)

26 (60.5)

34 (81.0)

30 (68.2)

32 (71.1)

Wall material

 Mud

13 (28.3)

12 (27.9)

7 (16.7)

16 (36.4)

12 (26.7)

0.14

 Brick

29 (63.0)

26 (60.5)

29 (69.0)

18 (40.9)

30 (66.7)

 Cement blocks

4 (8.7)

5 (11.6)

6 (14.3)

10 (22.7)

3 (6.7)

Eaves

 Open

36 (78.3)

32 (76.2)

25 (62.5)

19 (43.2)

12 (26.7)

 < 0.001

 Closed

10 (21.7)

10 (23.8)

15 (37.5)

25 (56.8)

33 (73.3)

  1. *SES missing for 25 study children