Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics of SP-IPTi efficacy trials

From: Can changes in malaria transmission intensity explain prolonged protection and contribute to high protective efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants?

Study parameter

Schellenberg et al. [2, 3]

Chandramohan et al. [4]

Macete et al[5]

Kobbe et al. [6]

Mockenhaupt et al. [7]

Grobusch et al[8]

Trial, country

Ifakara, Tanzania

Navrongo, Ghana

Manhica, Mozambique

Kumasi, Ghana

Tamale, Ghana

Lambaréné, Gabon

Recruitment year(s)

1999–2000

2000–2002

2002–2004

2003–2005

2003

2004–2005

EIR/year

29

418

38

400

NA

50

Transmission

Perennial moderate

Highly seasonal high

Perennial with seasonal peaks moderate

Perennial high

Perennial with seasonal peaks high

Perennial with seasonal peaks low-moderate

In vivo SP resistance by day 14%

31 (1999–2000) [10]

22 (2004) [11]

21 (2001) [12]

NA

14 (2002) [14]

21 (2004) [13]

Use of bed nets, % placebo/SP treated (untreated)

67/68

17/19

0/0 (14/15)

20/20 estimate (39/38)

<1%

5/5 (80/80)

Iron supplementation

Yes

Yes

None

None

None

None

Ages at dosing, months

2, 3, 9 (at time of DPT2, DPT3 & measles)

3, 4, 9, 12 (at time of DPT2, DPT3 & measles + extra at 12 months)

3, 4, 9 (at time of DPT2, DPT3 & measles)

3, 9, 15 (at time of DPT3 & measles + extra at 15 months)

3, 9, 15 (at time of DPT3 & measles + extra at 15 months)

3, 9, 15 (at time of DPT3 & measles + extra at 15 months)

No. of children enrolled, placebo/active

351/350 = 701

1,242/1,243 = 2,485

755/748 = 1,503

535/535 = 1,070

600/600 = 1,200

595/594 = 1,189

Study design

Individual randomization

Cluster randomization

Individual randomization

Individual randomization

Individual randomization

Individual randomization