AFR condition | Explanation |
---|---|
Relevance | Rationales for priority setting decisions must rest on reasons (evidence and principles) that 'fair-minded' people can agree are relevant in the context |
Publicity | Priority setting decisions and their rationales must be publicly accessible - justice cannot abide secrets where people's well being is concerned |
Revisions/appeals | There must be a mechanism for challenge, including the opportunity for revising decisions in light of considerations that stakeholders may raise |
Enforcement | There is either voluntary or public regulation of the process to ensure that the first three conditions are met. |