Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Malaria Journal

Fig. 1

From: Do holes in long-lasting insecticidal nets compromise their efficacy against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus? Results from a release–recapture study in experimental huts

Fig. 1

Proportions of mosquitoes fed and dead depending on the holed surface area on three mosquito species. The first column of panels a, b is for An. gambiae KISUMU strain, the second column of panels c, d is for An. gambiae collected in Akron, and the third row of panels e, f is for Cx. quinquefasciatus collected in Cotonou. The first row of panels a, c, e shows the proportion fed, the second row of panels b, d, f shows the proportion dead. Symbols show mean values with grey squares representing intact LLINs; cyan squares LLINs with holes of 3 cm2; magenta squares LLINs with holes of 30 cm2; yellow squares LLINs with holes of 300 cm2; black circles intact untreated nets; red circles untreated nets with holes of 3 cm2; lime green circles untreated nets with holes of 30 cm2; dark blue circles untreated nets with holes of 300 cm2. Grey circles represent the results from huts without nets. Vertical lines show 95 % confidence intervals, and (non-vertical lines) show the fitted relationships from logistic regressions.

Back to article page

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us