Table 4 Total anophelines captured and mean catch with each collection method at three sites
From: Comparative evaluation of anopheline sampling methods in three localities in Indonesia
| Â | Canti, Lampung | Kaliharjo, Purworejo | Saketa, Halmahera | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Mean per night | Total | Mean per night | Total | Mean per night | |
Mean anopheline catch per trap by site | ||||||
 HLC in | 827 | 51.7 | 14 | 0.9 | 3 | 0.4 |
 HLC out | 1277 | 79.8 | 243 | 15.2 | 2 | 0.3 |
 Large tent | 104 | 0.2 | 11 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.4 |
 Small tent | 82 | 6.5 | 3 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 |
 ITT | 13 | 5.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 |
 CDC-LT | 41 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.0 |
 Resting box in | 2 | 2.6 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.1 |
 Resting box out | 2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
 Resting jar in | 3 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
 Resting jar out | 2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
 Goat | – | – | – | – | 54 | 6.8 |
 Total | 2353 | 147.1 | 273 | 17.1 | 63 | 7.9 |