Tools | Capacity | Resources required | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|
Drug resistance | ||||
 Ex vivo/in vitro tests | Few samples | BSL2 for parasite culture, refrigerator, freezer, microscope, incubator | Several tests possible on same sample, no heavy equipment | Labor-intensive, expensive, generalization difficult due to different tests/methods, requires advance culture infrastructure |
 RSA/PSA | ||||
 TES | Hundreds | Refrigerator, freezer, microscope, incubator, PCR machine, gel electrophoresis, transilluminator | No heavy equipment required | Expensive |
 Molecular markers | Hundreds | PCR machine, Restriction enzymes, refrigerator, freezer, | Ease of sampling, storage and transport | Markers not always linked to clinical outcome, require good infrastructure and trained personnel |
Parasite diversity monitoring | ||||
 msp/glurp typing | Hundreds | PCR machine, Gel electrophoresis, transilluminator | Simple to implement | Labour-intensive, subjective interpretation |
 DNA barcodes | Thousands | Real time PCR | Sensitive, robust | Requires relatively sophisticated TaqMan or HRM assay |
 Microsatellite typing | Thousands | Real time PCR | Very informative from large range of alleles per locus | Requires relatively sophisticated PCR. Lack of standardization in scoring alleles |
 TDS | Hundreds | Sequencer, Server capacity for data storage | Less subject to inherent bias | High cost, requires large data storage capacity, requires skilled personnel. Target ascertainment bias |
 Genome wide analysis | Hundreds | Sequencers, Server capacity for data storage | Access to whole genome variants including single nucleotide and structural polymorphisms | As for TDS but need for target DNA enrichment against human DNA, difficulty in constructing haplotypes, and low sensitivity to detect minority clones |