Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of studies reporting the yield of malaria reactive case detection

From: What is the yield of malaria reactive case detection in the Greater Mekong Sub-region? A review of published data and meta-analysis

Reference

Location

Study period

Index case(s)

Contacts screened

Yield by

Microscopy

RDT

PCR

Rogawski et al. [6]

Bo Rai district, Trat province, Thailand

2011

1 index case, hospitalised with mixed P. falciparum–P. vivax infection, identified through passive case detection

126 neighbours within 1 km of the index case were screened

61 soldiers and neighbouring villages with a high proportion of migrants were screened

Microscopist at local malaria clinic—0 detected

Expert microscopist—1 in 187 (0.53%): P. falciparum

Not done or not reported

4 in 187 (2.14%), including the P. falciparum case detected by microscopy and 3 P. vivax cases, which were subsequently confirmed by microscopic examination of more fields

Xiao et al. [7]

Yingjiang County, Yunnan Province (China-Myanmar border), China

2014

Persons living around index cases within a radius of 100 m, 300 m, 500 m, and 1 km were screened

278 persons screened

3 in 278 (1.08%) malaria positive

Not done or not reported

6 in 278 (2.16%) malaria positive, all within 300 m radius around the index case

Hustedt J, et al. [8]

Pailin, Cambodia

2013–2014

270 index cases (91% P. vivax) identified through passive case detection and followed-up at home within 3 days

Household members of index cases were screened. For every 15th index case identified, the five nearest households to the index case’s household were invited to participate

For every 30th index case, the ten nearest households were invited to participate

Not done or not reported

9 in 1898 (0.47%) members of index and neighbour households: 7 P. vivax and 2 P. falciparum

17 in 1596 (1.07%) members of index and neighbour households: 15 P. vivax and 2 P. falciparum/P. vivax-mixed

Wang et al. [9]

Four counties in Yunnan Province, (China-Myanmar border), China

2012 to 2014

260 index cases reported and investigated, of which 182/260 (70.0%) had contacts screened

3,662 persons screened

10/3,662 (0.27%) malaria positive

Not done or not reported

Feng et al. [10]

China

2013 to 2014

101 cases reported and were categorized as residual non-active foci

2,985 members of index case’s household and neighbouring households within a 300-m radius were screened

Not done or not reported

4/2,985 (0.13%) malaria positive

RDT results verified by PCR at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

2015

28 indigenous cases were reported, and active foci response was carried out for all of them

1,447 members of index case’s household and neighbouring households within a 300-m radius were screened

Not done or not reported

2/1,447 (0.14%) malaria positive

Rossi et al. [11]

Chey Saen district, Preah Vihear province, Cambodia

2015 to 2017

194 index cases of P. falciparum malaria infection were identified

785 contacts screened:

623 household members of each index case were screened

162 “Co-exposed” individuals, mainly coworkers in settings with a high malaria infection risk, such as forests or plantations, were screened

Not done or not reported

7/785 (0.89%)

1/623 (0.2%) household members positive

6/162 (3.7%) co-workers positive

31/785 (3.95%)

20/623 (3.2%) household members positive

11/162 (6.8%) co-workers positive

Kheang et al. [12]

Sampov Loun, Cambodia

2015 to 2017

408 index cases identified

1,377 contacts screened, including members of index’s and surrounding household and co-travellers (persons who have been working, traveling, or staying outside of the home village with an index case in the past 3–4 weeks)

14/1,377 (1.02%) positive cases (nine P. falciparum and five P. vivax). All positive cases were identified among index case co-travellers; there were no cases identified among index household members or surrounding household members

Not done or not reported

Lek et al. [13]

Pailin

2013

270 index cases

1898 screened

Not done or not reported

9 (0.47%) positive

17 (0.90%) positive

Sampov Loun

2015–2018

639 index cases

1946 screened

Not done or not reported

15 (0.77%) positive

Not done

Preah Vihear

2016–2018

60 index cases

226 screened

Not done or not reported

2 (0.88%) positive

8 (3.54%) positive

Oddar Meanchey

2017–2018

192 index cases

1574 screened

Not done or not reported

26 (1.65%) positive

66 (4.19%) positive

  1. Number of malaria positive in contacts screened (%) by diagnostic test used is indicated in bold