Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic performance of LAMP techniques compared to qPCR

From: Head-to-head comparison of two loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kits for diagnosis of malaria in a non-endemic setting

Analysis

Sensitivity

Specificity

 

% (95% CI)

Proportion

% (95% CI)

Proportion

Alethia® Illumigene Malaria

90.24%

(76.87–97.28)

37/41

95.65%

(89.24–98.8)

88/92

HumaTurb Loopamp™ Malaria PDT

100%

(91.40–100)

41/41

100%

(96.07–100)

92/92