Comparison of different trapping methods to collect malaria vectors indoors and outdoors in western Kenya

Malaria Journal

Table 1 Summary of mosquito numbers collected by each trapping method

Species	Trapping location	CDC-LT		UV-LT		HLC		Resting collections		Total Females	Total Males	Total Anopheles
Species	Trapping location	Females	Males	Females	Males	Females	Males	Females	Males	Total Females	Total Males	Total Anopheles
An. funestus	Indoor	249	308	456	560	61	28	997	567	1763	1463	3777
An. funestus	Outdoor	125	42	248	82	26	2	7	19	406	145	3777
An. gambiae	Indoor	26	15	51	16	2	0	53	28	132	59	385
An. gambiae	Outdoor	30	9	99	25	1	0	15	15	152	50	385
An. coustani	Indoor	38	2	9	4	5	0	0	0	52	6	1061
An. coustani	Outdoor	304	34	577	37	20	0	20	11	921	82	1061
Other Anopheles Species*	Indoor	0	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4	147
Other Anopheles Species*	Outdoor	27	3	107	4	2	0	0	0	136	7	147

^*Other Anopheles species included: An. pharoensis (N = 120), An. rufipes (N = 16), An. gibbinsi (N = 5), An. parensis (N = 3), An. maculipalpis (N = 1), An. chrysti (N = 1), and An. tenebrosus (N = 1). Only An. rufipes (N = 3) and An. parensis (N = 1) were trapped indoors. The rest were trapped outdoors

ISSN: 1475-2875