- Open Access
Recent reduction in the water level of Lake Victoria has created more habitats for Anopheles funestus
© Minakawa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 05 January 2008
- Accepted: 03 July 2008
- Published: 03 July 2008
The water level of Lake Victoria has fallen more than 1.5 m since 1998, revealing a narrow strip of land along the shore. This study determined whether the recent drop in the water level has created additional breeding grounds for malaria vectors.
The recent and past shorelines were estimated using landmarks and a satellite image. The locations of breeding habitats were recorded using a GPS unit during the high and low lake water periods. GIS was used to determine whether the breeding habitats were located on newly emerged land between the new and old shorelines.
Over half of the breeding habitats existed on newly emerged land. Fewer habitats for the Anopheles gambiae complex were found during the low water level period compared to the high water period. However, more habitats for Anopheles funestus were found during the high water level period, and they were all located on the newly emerged land.
The recent reduction in water level of Lake Victoria has increased the amount of available habitat for A. funestus. The results suggest that the water drop has substantially affected the population of this malaria vector in the Lake Victoria basin, particularly because the lake has a long shoreline that may harbour many new breeding habitats.
- Indian Ocean Dipole
- Malaria Vector
- Water Period
- Breeding Habitat
- Lake Water Level
As the lake water level has declined, a narrow strip of land has appeared along the shore. This newly emerged land space may become a potential breeding ground for malaria vectors. Seepage water from nearby hills and the lake often create numerous stagnant water pools on the lakeshore, and waves sometimes feed the pools with lake water . This study investigated whether the recent reduction in the water level of Lake Victoria has created more breeding habitats for malaria vectors.
The study area was approximately 3.8 km2 and was surrounded by lake water to the north, west, and east. The elevation increases gradually toward a hill in the southern area of the site. The hill is approximately 1,300 m above sea level, and the lake surface was approximately 1,134 m above sea level in early 2008. There were no permanent streams and reservoirs, and the population of the area was approximately 5,000 in early 2008. Most residents depend on fishing and traditional small-scale farming. Two rainy seasons occur annually from approximately March to June and October to November, but the periods vary among years. The total annual rainfall in 2007 was 1,179.5 mm, and the average temperature was 23.0°C (maximum: 31.5°C, minimum: 16.0°C). Malaria is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality of children in the region .
The area of the narrow strip of land emerging along the lakeshore was estimated from past and recent shorelines. The past shoreline was reconstructed from remnants of old lake bank that were formed by waves during the period of high lake water in 1998. Landmarks photographed in 1998 and 1999 were also used to reconstruct the shoreline. The photographed landmarks included fences, stonewalls, trees, and mosquito breeding sites near the old shoreline. These sites were revisited in early 2008, and their coordinates were recorded using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit and were plotted on the satellite image taken in June 2006 (0.6-m ground resolution Quick Bird image; Digital Globe, Longmont, CO, USA; the water level was approximately 0.9 m below the average in June 2006) using a geographical information system (GIS; Arc View 9.2; Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA). With the exception of most of the breeding sites, most of the landmarks were still visible on the satellite image and were used to correct any GPS errors. The recent shoreline was estimated using the satellite image. The distance between the recent and past shorelines along approximately 6.8 km of shoreline was estimated at 68 points at 100-m intervals using GIS.
Habitat data during the period of high lake water were obtained from three previous studies [8, 10, 11]. All stagnant water habitats in the study area were surveyed three times during the rainy seasons (February to March 1998; March and May 1999), and once during the dry season (February 1999). At each habitat, 2 to 50 samples (depending on habitat size) were collected to confirm the presence/absence of anopheline larvae. Sampled larvae were immediately preserved in 96% ethanol.
When numerous small habitats were present in an area, it was considered a single site. The characteristics of habitats were noted, and their locations were recorded using a GPS unit. The survey was repeated three times during the rainy season (March and April 2008) and once during the dry season (February 2008) when the lake water was low.
Sampled larvae were identified under light microscopy using the identification key of Gillies and Coetzee . For the surveys during the period of high lake water, the Anopheles gambiae complex and the Anopheles funestus complex were further identified to species using an rDNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method . Indistinguishable small individuals were also examined using the PCR method.
For the surveys during the low lake water period, anophelines found in unvegetated habitats were assumed to belong to the A. gambiae complex, because previous studies have demonstrated that all anophelines in the habitats of this area were either Anopheles arabiensis or A. gambiae [8, 10, 11]. However, two anopheline groups, the A. funestus complex and the Anopheles coustani complex (non-malaria vector), occur in vegetated habitats, and A. arabiensis and A. gambiae may also occur in small unshaded habitats, such as animal footprints, associated with large vegetated pools. Thus, large individuals (third or fourth instars) from vegetated habitats were identified under light microscopy. Because A. funestus is the only species within its complex known to inhabit the study area, individuals identified as belonging to the A. funestus complex were assumed to be A. funestus. Thus, the PCR method was only applied to microscopically indistinguishable small individuals from vegetated habitats in later surveys.
Anopheline larvae were found in 69 discrete breeding habitats during the high lake water period (Figure 2). Seven habitats (10.2%) were shaded by emergent aquatic plants, such as sedge (Cladium) or were covered with water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) or duckweed (Lemnaceae). All vegetated habitats were found near the lakeshore, and four of these were partially connected to the lake. The other 62 (89.8%) habitats had little vegetation.
In total, 2,840 larvae were examined for species identification, and 2,621 were identified from the surveys during the high lake water period. The species composition included the following: A. gambiae (75.0%), A. arabiensis (23.4%), A. funestus (1.5%), and the A. coustani complex (0.1%). Only one vegetated habitat had both A. funestus and the A. coustani complex but did not have the A. gambiae complex. The other 68 (98.6%) habitats had either or both A. arabiensis and A. gambiae.
During the low lake water period, anopheline larvae were found in 71 discrete habitats (Figure 2), 36 (50.7%) of which were found on the newly emerged land. Twenty-five habitats (35.2%) were vegetated and were all located on the newly emerged land. Of these vegetated habitats, 12 were partially connected to the lake. In addition, 11 unvegetated habitats were found on emerged land. All inland habitats had little vegetation. The proportion of vegetated to unvegetated habitats was significantly higher during the low compared to the high lake water period (chi-squared test: χ2 = 12.09, P < 0.001).
During the low lake water period, 198 larvae from vegetated habitats were examined microscopically. Of these, 29 individuals belonged to the A. funestus complex, 12 to the A. gambiae complex, 30 to the A. coustani complex, and 127 were unidentified. The results of the PCR method applied to the unidentified individuals revealed that 15 individuals were A. funestus, 20 were A. gambiae, 26 were A. arabiensis, and the remaining 66 individuals were unidentifiable. Because the A. coustani complex was not analysed using PCR identification, several unidentified individuals may belong to this complex.
Anopheles funestus and the A. coustani complex were found in 18 and 16 vegetated habitats during the low water period, respectively, and more of their habitats were available during the low water period than the high water period. All habitats of these species were located on the newly emerged land. The proportion of A. funestus habitats relative to the total number of habitats was significantly higher during the low (25.4%) compared to the high water period (1.5%; chi-squared test: χ2 = 20.34, P < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of habitats of the A. coustani complex was significantly higher during the low (22.5%) than the high water period (1.5%; chi-squared test: χ2 = 17.31, P < 0.001).
The A. gambiae complex was also found in 14 vegetated habitats. In total, 60 of 71 habitats contained the A. gambiae complex, which was found in more habitats during the high lake water period. Twenty-five of these habitats were located on the newly emerged land. The proportion of habitats positive for the A. gambiae complex was significantly higher during the high (98.5%) than the low water period (84.5%; chi-squared test: χ2 = 10.22, P = 0.001).
Although the total number of habitats during the low lake water period was nearly equal to that during the high water period, the number of habitats for the A. gambiae complex was lower during the low lake water period. Because habitat availability for the A. gambiae complex largely depends on rainfall , it is difficult to determine whether the lake water level affects the availability of habitats for this species. Because the A. gambiae complex breeds in small temporal habitats , many suitable habitats quickly appear after several heavy rains but disappear during the dry period . In fact, the unusually high amount of rainfall in 1997 and early 1998 created several habitats for the A. gambiae complex, whereas only one habitat for A. funestus existed during this same period. Habitats for A. funestus are stable for longer periods [15, 16], and rainfall alone cannot explain the increase in A. funestus habitats.
The emerged land was initially bare and lacked dense vegetation. When the lake water level stabilized, short grasses gradually covered the area, and emergent aquatic plants later began to invade the aquatic habitats. Local farmers have been reluctant to farm the land, because it may again become submerged in the future. The lack of human activity was crucial to the appearance of A. funestus habitats. When the water level was high in 1998 and 1999, it rose close to houses and farms, such that little space was left to accumulate enough water for A. funestus to breed, although small puddles were sufficient for breeding of the A. gambiae complex. However, if the lake water level remains low, farmers will begin to convert the vegetated aquatic habitats to farmland. Consequently, this activity may convert the habitats for A. funestus to habitats for the A. gambiae complex by creating small sun-lit open puddles and ditches that lack tall aquatic vegetation [17, 18].
These findings clearly indicate that the recent reduction in the water of Lake Victoria has increased the number of habitats for A. funestus. Although the results should not be simply extrapolated to other areas, the water reduction is likely to substantially affect the populations of malaria vectors in the Lake Victoria basin, particularly because Lake Victoria is the second largest freshwater body in the world and has numerous islands and a long shoreline in an area to which malaria is endemic. The availability of habitats is usually more limited for A. funestus compared to the A. gambiae complex, but the recent water drop may increase the role of A. funestus in malaria transmission in the basin.
We thank Dr. John Githure of the International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology for facilitating this study and eight field assistants for conducting the field survey. Mr. James Kongere and Ms. Mercy Syombua identified the larvae using the PCR method. Several local farmers provided valuable information on water levels and wetlands. This study was supported by the Nagasaki University-JICA collaborative fund from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
- United States Department of Agriculture: Reservoir database. [http://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/global_reservoir]
- Nicholson SE: Historical and modern fluctuations of lakes Tanganyika and Rukwa and their relationship to rainfall variability. Climatic Change. 1999, 41: 53-71. 10.1023/A:1005424619718.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yin X, Nicholson SE: Interpreting annual rainfall from the level of Lake Victoria. J Hydrometeorol. 2002, 3: 406-416. 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0406:IARFTL>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Black E, Slingo J, Sperber KR: An observation study of the relationship between excessively short rain in coastal East Africa and Indian Ocean SST. Monthly Weather Rev. 2003, 131: 74-94. 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0074:AOSOTR>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marchant R, Mumbi C, Behera S, Yamagata T: The Indian Ocean dipole – the unsung driver of climatic variability in East Africa. Afr J Ecol. 2006, 45: 4-16. 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00707.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Awange JL, Sharifi A, Ogonda G, Wickert J, Grafarend EW, Omulo MA: The falling Lake Victoria water level: GRACE, TRIMM and CHAMP satellite analysis of the lake basin. Water Res Manage. 2007, DOI:10.1007/s11269-007-9191-yGoogle Scholar
- Sutcliffe JV, Petersen G: Lake Victoria: derivation of a corrected natural water level series. Hydrol Sci. 2007, 52: 1316-1321. 10.1623/hysj.52.6.1316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Minakawa N, Seda P, Yan G: Influence of host and larval habitat distribution on the abundance of African malaria vectors in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 67: 32-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mutero CM, Ouma JH, Agak BK, Wanderi JA, Copeland RS: Malaria prevalence and use of self-protection measures against mosquitoes in Suba District, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 1998, 75: 11-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minakawa N, Mutero CM, Githure JI, Beier JC, Yan G: Spatial distribution and habitat characterization of anopheline mosquito larvae in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999, 61: 1010-1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minakawa N, Githure JI, Beier JC, Yan G: Anopheline mosquito survival strategies during the dry period in western Kenya. J Med Entomol. 2001, 38: 388-392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillies MT, Coetzee M: A supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Afrotropical region). 1987, The South African Institute for Medical ResearchGoogle Scholar
- Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minakawa N, Sonye G, Yan G: Relationships between occurrence of Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) and size and stability of larval habitats. J Med Entomol. 2005, 42: 295-300. 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0295:RBOOAG]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillies MT, DeMeillon B: The Anophelinae of Africa, south of the Sahara. 1968, The South African Institute for Medical ResearchGoogle Scholar
- Evans A, Symes C: Anopheles funestus and its allies in Kenya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1937, 31: 105-112.Google Scholar
- Minakawa N, Sonye G, Mogi M, Yan G: Habitat characteristics of Anopheles gambiae s.s. larvae in a Kenyan highland. Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18: 301-305. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00503.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minakawa N, Munga S, Atieli F, Mushinzimana E, Zhou G, Githeko AK, Yan G: Spatial distribution of anopheline larval habitats in western Kenyan highlands: effects of land cover types and topography. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 73: 157-165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.