Skip to main content

Advertisement

Host genetic polymorphisms and serological response against malaria in a selected population in Sri Lanka

Article metrics

  • 667 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Antibodies against the merozoite surface protein 1-19 (MSP1-19) and the apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) of the malaria parasite (Plasmodium vivax) are proven to be important in protection against clinical disease. Differences in the production/maintenance of antibodies may be due to many factors including host genetics. This paper discusses the association of 4 anti-malarial antibodies with selected host genetic markers.

Methods

Blood was collected from individuals (n = 242) with a history of malaria within past 15 years for DNA and serum. ELISA was carried out for serum to determine the concentration of anti-malarial antibodies MSP1-19 and AMA1 for both vivax and falciparum malaria. 170 SNPs related to malaria were genotyped. Associations between seropositivity, antibody levels and genetic, non-genetic factors were determined.

Results

Age ranged 13–74 years (mean age = 40.21 years). Majority were females. Over 90% individuals possessed either one or more type(s) of anti-malarial antibodies. Five SNPs were significantly associated with seropositivity. One SNP was associated with MSP1-19_Pv(rs739718); 4 SNPs with MSP1-19_Pf (rs6874639, rs2706379, rs2706381 and rs2075820) and1 with AMA1_Pv (rs2075820). Eleven and 7 genotypes (out of 15) were significantly associated with either presence or absence of antibodies. Three SNPs were found to be significantly associated with the antibody levels viz. rs17411697 with MSP1-19_Pv, rs2227491 with AMA1_Pv and rs229587 with AMA1_Pf. Linkage of the markers in the two groups was similar, but lower LOD scores were observed in seropositives compared to seronegatives.

Discussion and conclusions

The study suggests that several SNPs in the human genome that exist in Sri Lankan populations are significantly associated with anti-malarial antibodies, either with generation and/or maintenance of antibodies for longer periods, which can be due to either individual polymorphisms or most probably a combined effect of the markers.

Background

Malaria is considered as one of the most prevalent infectious diseases in the world with high morbidity and mortality. However, several countries plagued with this infection for centuries, were able to eliminate it from its borders between 2007 and present date, i.e. Armenia, Maldives, Morocco, Turkmenistan and United Arab Emirates [1].

Sri Lanka too joined the group of malaria–free countries in September 2016 when the World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a malaria-free nation [2]. Although the number of indigenous malaria cases remain as zero since October 2012 [3, 4], resurgence of malaria is possible through imported malaria cases that remains as a threat with 95, 49, 36, 41 and 57 cases of imported malaria reported in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively [5].

Naturally acquired antibodies play a major role in protection against malaria. Anti-parasite immunity is complex and stage specific. Following exposure to the parasite, both innate and adaptive immune responses are triggered. Antibodies produced against the parasite antigens have a protective role on subsequent infections, i.e. repeated infections trigger immunity to uncomplicated as well as severe malaria [6]. Furthermore, once acquired, anti-malarial antibodies are long-lasting [7] enhancing its importance in immunity to malaria infections.

The merozoite surface protein 1-19 (MSP1-19), which is a 195 kD protein on the surface of the merozoite, has been studied extensively as a vaccine candidate. Evidence from in vitro and challenge studies suggest that MSP1-19 might have an immunoprophylactic effect against malaria [8,9,10]. Furthermore, antibodies against both MSP1-19 of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax have been associated with protection against clinical disease in areas of stable transmission [11,12,13,14]. Similarly, the apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1), which is essential in erythrocyte invasion by the parasite, has also been studied as a vaccine candidate [15] as well as an anti-malarial drug target [16]. AMA1 is also proven to be important in protection against clinical disease [13, 17, 18]. Thus, antibodies produced against these antigens are considered to play an important role in malaria immunity.

However, the role of antibodies as a protective armour against the infections may vary among individuals. This variability can account for the differences in susceptibility to malaria in individuals of similar age who live in malaria endemic areas. Differences in the production/maintenance of antibodies may be due to many factors including those related to socio-economic background, such as nutrition; epidemiology that include intensity of exposure; and host genetics.

The association between the host genes and antibody responses to malaria has been revealed by previous studies. A study done in Liberia in 1992 showed that antibody response against the malarial antigen Pf155/RESA is more consonant between monozygotic twins, when compared to dizygotic twins or age, sex matched sibling pairs [19]. Association between specific polymorphisms of genes and immune response has been documented by other investigators. Luoni et al. reported the association between the polymorphisms of the gene IL4-524 and anti-malaria antibody levels in a West African population [20]. In Sri Lanka, a study done in a previously malaria-endemic area revealed several single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with high antibody levels [7]. Afridi et al. reported the effect of polymorphisms of the genes HBB, IL-4, IL-12, TNF, LTA, NCR3 and FCGR2A on the levels of IgG responses against P. falciparum blood stage extracts suggesting the genetic effect on antibody response could be multifactorial [21]. A large multi-centre study conducted including 13,299 individuals from Africa and South Asia confirmed the fact that the genetic factors can determine an individual’s immune response to malaria [22].

This study looked into the relationship between humoral immunity against malaria (using 4 anti-malarial antibodies, i.e. MSP1-19 and AMA1 of P. vivax and P. falciparum) and host genetic polymorphisms of selected genes known to be associated with malaria in a previously endemic population of Sri Lanka.

Methods

Study site

The present study was conducted in 2 previously malaria endemic districts in Sri Lanka, i.e. Kurunegala district of North Western province and Moneragala district of Uva province. Four District Secretariat Divisions (DSDs) (out of 11 DSDs) from Moneragala district and 12 (out of 30 DSDs) from Kurunegala district were selected on the basis of presence of the District/Base hospitals or Medical Officer of Health (MOH) offices. Second stage clusters were determined after selecting the initial clusters. Two Grama Niladhari Divisions (GNDs) were randomly selected from each selected DSD by drawing lots (i.e. 8 and 24 GNDs from Moneragala and Kurunegala, respectively). Identification of locations were done within the secondary clusters by using relevant area maps from the Department of Census and Statistics of Sri Lanka [23].

Recruitment of individuals

Voluntary participants from the selected area and people visiting either the area hospital or MOH offices for other blood investigations and who were willing to give a sample of blood for the present study were initially recruited for the study after obtaining informed consent. Before enrolment they were inquired on their history of malaria attacks, and people who have had malaria within past 15 years were recruited for the study. The selected individuals were given a unique identification number.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance for this study was granted by the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka (Certificate No: EC-11-191).

Sample/data collection

Two millilitres of blood was drawn from the selected individuals by a trained nurse or a medical laboratory technician. This was divided into 2 tubes, one coated with EDTA (Ethylene Di-amine Tetra-acetic Acid) and the other a plain tube with each individual’s unique identification number. The samples in the EDTA tube were stored in a − 20 °C freezer until transfer to the laboratory in Colombo. Blood in the plain tube was allowed to clot for 4–5 h at 4 °C and was centrifuged at 12,000 rounds per minute (r.p.m.) to separate the serum. Serum was carefully extracted to a separate eppendorf tube labeled with the identification number. These serum samples were stored in the − 20 °C freezer until transfer to Colombo. Both the blood samples in EDTA and the serum samples were then transported to the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo in ice packs in frozen condition. Data on age, sex and previous malaria history of individuals were collected.

Enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay (ELISA)

A standard ELISA protocol described elsewhere [7, 24] was used to determine the seropositive and seronegative samples. In summary: anti-malarial antigens MSP1-19 (School of Life Sciences, Edinburgh, UK) and AMA1 (BPRC, The Netherlands), for both P. vivax and P. falciparum, were used in this protocol. ELISA plates (96 micro-well plates/Nunclon, Germany) were coated with 50 µL of antigen, i.e. MSP1-19-Pf, MSP1-19-Pv, AMA1_Pf or AMA1_Pv. Plates were incubated at 4 °C overnight and were washed three times with Phosphate Buffered Saline with 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS/T). To each well 100 µL of diluted serum samples (1: 200 for MSP1-19 and 1: 400 for AMA1 in 2% skimmed milk in PBS/T) were added. Each ELISA plate contained 46 test samples in duplicate, a known positive control in duplicate, a known negative control and a blank well. The plates were incubated at 4 °C overnight. They were washed 3 times in PBS/T and 50 µL of horse radish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich/Cat#A8792) diluted in 1:2000 in PBS/T was added to each well. This was incubated for 3 h at room temperature (27 °C–29 °C) before washing 3 times in PBS/T. To each well 50 µL of OPD substrate solution (Sigma-Aldrich/Cat#P1526)(0.4 mg/mL in solvent) was added. This was left for 15 min for the colour to develop. The reaction was stopped by adding 25 µL of 2 M H2SO4 per well. Then the plates were read at 492 nm using an ELISA micro-plate reader. The Optical Density (OD) value for each well was recorded separately.

Standard procedures were carried out throughout the laboratory tests to maintain the validity of the protocols. The same positive control with known concentration was included in every ELISA plate and a chart was maintained to identify any significant deviations (± 2 SD) of the OD value of the particular sample for normalization of the data.

Formation of standard antibody concentration curves and determination of antibody levels

Standard antibody concentration curves were drawn using serum samples with known antibody concentration previously quantified using standard methods, at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, UK. The corresponding OD values of the samples diluted 2-fold, 4-fold, 8-fold, 16-fold and 32-fold were obtained using the same ELISA protocol. The antibody levels in each sample were determined using the Microsoft Excel Trend function for linear regression. Individuals who obtained ≤ 0 antibody level value in regression were considered “individuals without antibodies (seronegatives)”—group A; and individuals with a value > 0 were considered as “individuals with antibodies (seropositives)”—group B.

DNA extraction and genotyping

The blood collected in the EDTA coated tube was used for DNA extraction using QIAGEN QIamp DNA blood mini kit (Cat No: 51106) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Genotyping was done at the laboratory of the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford UK. Hundred and seventy SNPs were selected on the basis of a review of reports of associations with malaria data from The MalariaGEN Consortium [25]. Genotyping of these selected SNPs (Additional file 1) were carried out by previously described methods [7]; in summary: five nanograms of gDNA was whole-genome amplified by primer-extension pre-amplification (PEP) using N15 primers (Sigma, UK) and Biotaq (Bioline, UK) polymerase as previously described by Zhang et al. [26]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were assayed on the Sequenom® iPLEX platform according to manufacturer’s instructions using diluted PEP DNA (1:10). Genotype calls were made using the Sequenom® Typer v4.03 software [25].

Data analysis

Data were entered to a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and SPSS V19.0 spreadsheet. Association of antibody levels and non-genetic/genetic factors were determined. Presence/absence of antibodies (seropositivity) as well as the mean antibody levels between males/females and between the two districts were compared using Chi squared test/t-test, and the medians were compared using Mann–Whitney U test.

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed for all the SNPs using Haploview V4.2 software [27]. Genotypes were compared against presence or absence of antibodies (Chi squared test and binary logistic regression, adjusted for age, gender and location of residence); the mean antibody levels (ANOVA) and median antibody levels (Kruskal–Wallis test, Median test).

The study population was divided into 2 groups, i.e. individuals without any type of anti-malarial antibody (Group A) and individuals with one or more types of anti-malarial antibodies (Group B). Allele frequencies of all significant SNPs associated with the presence/absence of antibodies were calculated in these 2 groups separately. Minor allele frequencies of the two groups were compared by using the ratios of the two groups.

Haplotype analysis and determination of linkage disequilibrium (LD) was carried out using Haploview V 4.2 genetic data analysis software. Haplotype blocks were generated as described by Gabriel et al. in 2002, where a haplotype block was created if 95% of the informative comparisons are in strong LD [28].

When analysing the genotypes, individuals who had genotype mismatches and/or genotyping errors for a particular SNP were excluded. Thus, the number of individuals considered for each SNP was different. Three SNPs were removed from further analysis due to high rates of (> 10%) genotyping errors, i.e. rs5743810, hTNF-α376 and rs8176719. Antibody levels of 3 individuals could not be determined for errors generated obtaining OD values from ELISA. These individuals were excluded from analyses concerning antibody levels.

Results

Characteristics of the population

This study population comprised 242 individuals who confirmed they have had malaria within the past 15 years from 2 districts, i.e. Kurunegala (n = 136) and Moneragala (n = 106). The age ranged from 13 to 74 years with a mean age of 40.21 years. When individual sites (districts) were considered, ages ranged from 13 to 74 years in Kurunegala with a mean age of 36.77 years and a median of 32.50 years; and in Moneragala 16–70 years with a mean age of 44.64 years and a median of 46.50 years. Only 1.2% of the population was under 15 years of age, and the majority (> 75%) were between 16 and 60 years. There was no record of age in 5.4% (n = 13) participants (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the population

When the whole population was considered, the majority were females (74%), whereas when the districts were considered separately, 86.8% were females in the Kurunegala district, and 57.5% were females in the Moneragala district. The percentage of females in the Kurunegala district was significantly higher than the percentage of males when compared to the Moneragala district (χ2 = 81.18, df = 2, p < 0.05).

Within the study population 187 (77.3%) had AMA1_Pv antibodies, 185 (76.4%) had AMA1_Pf antibodies, 167 (69%) had MSP1-19_Pv antibodies and 111 (45.9%) had MSP1-19_Pf antibodies. Overall, only 23 individuals out of 242 (9.5%) did not possess any type of antibodies; Over 90% individuals of this study population possessed either one or more type(s) of anti-malarial antibodies tested.

Association between non-genetic factors and presence/absence of antibodies (seropositivity)

The association of the presence of antibodies with age, gender and the location were tested. The population was divided into 5 age groups with equal intervals of 15 years to test the relationship between the age and presence of antibodies in individuals, i.e. 1–15 years (n = 3), 16–30 years (n = 79), 31–45 years (n = 57), 46–60 years (n = 55) and 61–75 years (n = 35). Anti-malarial antibody levels of MSP1-19 for both P. falciparum and P. vivax were significantly associated with age (χ2 = 14.90, df = 4, p = 0.005). Percentages of individuals with/without MSP1-19_Pf were significantly different in age groups 2 (16–30 year olds) and 4 (46–60 year olds). In age group 2, the percentage of seronegatives (68.4%) was significantly higher than the percentage of seropositives (31.6%). In age group 4 the trend seen was the opposite with the percentage of seropositives (61.8%) being significantly higher than the percentage of seronegatives (38.2%) for MSP1-19_Pf. For MSP1-19_Pv the percentage of seropositives (54.5%) in age group 3 (31–45 year olds) was significantly higher than the percentage of seronegatives (45.5%) (χ2 = 9.6, df = 4, p = 0.048).

There were more seropositive males (for all 4 types of antibodies tested) when compared to seropositive females. A highly significant association could be observed between gender and presence of MSP1-19_Pf antibody, with 72.1% of males being seropositive and majority (63.1%) of females being seronegative (χ2 = 22.78, df = 1, p < 0.05).

The percentage of seropositives was significantly higher for all tested antibodies in Moneragala district when compared to the Kurunegala district, except for anti-AMA1 antibodies for P. falciparum (Table 2).

Table 2 Percentages of individuals with and without antibodies in each district

Association between the non-genetic factors and the mean/median antibody levels

The association of antibody levels with age, gender and the residence were determined. When the whole population was considered, the mean antibody level increased with age, but decreased after ~ 60 years. A simple linear regression and curvilinear regression (including a quadratic model) was calculated to predict antibody levels based on age. There was no significant correlation (linear or non-linear) between age and antibody levels in the whole population or within age groups for any tested antibody.

Mean and median antibody levels were compared between the districts. The mean level of AMA1_Pf was significantly higher in Moneragala (mean = 6258.90 U/μL) when compared to Kurunegala (mean = 1927.91 U/μL) (t = − 2.703, df = 237, p = 0.007). Mann–Whitney U test was carried out to compare the median antibody levels between the two districts. The medians of all tested antibodies were significantly different between the districts (p < 0.05) (Additional file 2). The mean and median antibody levels between males and females were compared using the t test and Mann–Whitney U test. There were no significant differences in the means/medians of any tested antibodies between males and females except for median MSP1-19_Pf antibody level, which was significantly higher in males (1296.55 IU/μL) when compared to females (0.00 IU/μL) (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05).

Correlation between the antibodies was tested using the Pearson’s correlation. The greatest positive correlation was observed between the 2 vivax antibodies MSP1-19 and AMA1 and the least correlation was between MSP1-19_Pf and AMA1_Pv. None of the tested antibodies were normally distributed within the study population or within each age group (Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test, p < 0.005) (Additional file 3).

Association between the genotypes and the presence/absence of antibodies

The genotype distribution of the selected SNPs studied was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05). Five SNPs were significantly associated with seropositivity in individuals (Table 3). Eleven and 7 genotypes (out of 15) were significantly associated with either the presence or absence of antibodies under the co dominant or dominant models, respectively. One SNP was associated with MSP1-19_Pv (rs739718); 4 SNPs with MSP1-19_Pf (rs6874639, rs2706379, rs2706381 and rs2075820) and1 with AMA1_Pv(rs2075820) (Table 3).

Table 3 Genotypes of the SNPs and the association with presence/absence of antibodies

The minor allele frequencies of the significant SNPs of the two groups were calculated. The highest difference between the minor allele frequencies of the 2 groups, i.e. seropositive and seronegative, could be observed for the SNP rs739718 (1.669). The ratios for the other significant SNPs were within a close range (~ 1.1) except for rs2075820 in which the ratio was < 1 (Additional file 4).

Association between the genotypes and the antibody level

Three SNPs were found to be significantly associated with the antibody levels of this study population viz. rs17411697 with MSP1-19_Pv, rs2227491 with AMA1_Pv and rs229587 with AMA1_Pf (Table 4). The median antibody levels were significantly different among the individuals with different genotypes of these SNPs. Pair-wise comparison of the median antibody levels of individuals with different genotypes of rs17411697 revealed the median MSP1-19_Pv antibody level of individuals with the genotype GT (median = 1116.42 IU/μL) was significantly higher when compared to the individuals with the genotype GG (median = 788.56 IU/μL) or genotype TT (median = 229.83 IU/μL) (median test, p = 0.042). For rs2227491 the median AMA1_Pv antibody levels of study subjects with CT genotype was significantly higher (median = 2113.65 IU/μL) when compared to the median antibody level of individuals with CC genotype (median = 1124.03 IU/μL) (p = 0.021). Similarly, the individuals with TT genotype of rs229587 had significantly higher AMA1_Pf antibody levels (median = 902.02 IU/μL) when compared to individuals with the genotype CC (median = 513.28 IU/μL) (p = 0.049).

Table 4 Association of genotypes with the median antibody levels: the median antibody levels of the individuals with each type of genotype of each SNP are indicated within brackets

Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analysis

High linkage (D’ ~ 1.0 and r2 > 0.90) could be observed between 3 markers (i.e. rs6874639, rs2706379 and rs2706381) out of the 5 markers which were associated with seropositivity; but this could be observed in both seronegative (Group A) and seropositive groups (Group B). Linkage of the markers in the two groups were similar for but lower LOD scores (range 9.72–11.12) were observed in group A when compared to very high LOD scores (77.37–89.52) seen in group B. There was only one haplotype block containing rs2706379 and rs2706381 in both study groups. The 3 markers which were significantly associated with antibody levels were not in linkage with each other.

Eighteen blocks could be identified when all tested markers (n = 170) were considered in the LD plot generated for group B whereas there were only 8 blocks in group A. The 2 LD plots of the 2 groups displayed different patterns indicating differences in linkage of the tested SNPs between the two groups (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

LD plots of the all the tested SNPs (n-170). The LD plots were generated separately for the two groups; group a sero-negative individuals and group b sero-positive individuals. The red arrows points where there is a block of SNPs (LD block) in high linkage disequilibrium. Red squares indicate high LD and the white square indicate very low or no LD

Discussion

This study was conducted to investigate the host genetic factors that may be associated with malaria immunity. Two hundred and forty-two individuals who verbally confirmed having had malaria within the past 15 years through recall memory from two previously malaria endemic districts of Sri Lanka were selected for this study. Only the individuals who provided convincing verbal evidence of having symptomatic disease of malaria in his/her past medical history were included in the study (out of 1186 interviewed only 242 were selected). The medical records were cross-checked where available. The majority was between 16 and 60 years of age and there were no children who were below 13 years. This could be easily explained since malaria transmission in Sri Lanka declined drastically approximately 15 years ago [3, 24] and the percentage of children below ~ 15 years with a history of malaria is extremely low. This very fact might be the reason for the observation that the seropositivity with regard to anti-malarial antibodies was significantly higher in older age groups (age group 3:MSP1-19_Pv/age group 4: MSP1-19_Pf) and lower in younger age groups (age group 2: MSP1-19_Pf).

There was a progressive increase in antibody levels up to about 45–60 years after which there was a drop. The lower antibody levels in younger age groups most likely reflect the decreasing trend in malaria transmission seen in Sri Lanka since year 2000 and prior to total elimination [3] with an absence of exposure to malaria in the very young age groups; low levels of exposure of the age group 15–30 year olds; and higher cumulative exposure to the disease of the older age groups. In addition to the exposure, the older population tend to retain the antibodies, once acquired when compared to the younger individuals, which is in line with previous observations made elsewhere as well as locally [24, 29,30,31]. Ondigo et al. in 2014 reported the antibody MSP1-19_Pf half-life being very short and sero-reversion being high for young children when compared to adults [31]. This observation is also supported by initial sero-epidemiological studies done by Warren et al. in the 1970s suggesting that antibodies in young children are often being short-lived and longer lasting in adults [30, 32]. Antibody secreting plasma cells are either short-lived or long-lived. In contrast to long-lived plasma cells, which survive and secrete antibodies for longer periods independently, short-lived plasma cells decline after an infection and are needed to be restored from memory B-cells [33, 34]. Akpogheneta et al. in 2008 suggested that the reason for short lived antibodies among children might be due to children having short lived plasma cells, which decline rapidly after an infection when compared to adults who can produce long-lived plasma cells derived from the germinal centre [6].

The relationship between age and immunity has been documented by others. Reily et al. described that the antibody prevalence of MSP1-19 of P. falciparum increased with age in a cross sectional survey done in Gambia [14]; and Noland et al. made the same observations with several types of antibodies against P. falciparum malaria parasites including AMA1 and MSP1-19 in a population in Western Kenya [35].

The frequency of seropositivity in males was much higher when compared to that in females. Similarly, the mean and median levels of antibodies of male individuals were higher (ranged between 71 and 86%). The percentage of females with anti-malarial antibodies ranged between 60 and 75% for all the tested antibodies except for MSP1-19_Pf (only 36.9% of females were with MSP1-19_Pf antibody) making the percentage of females with the antibody significantly lower when compared to the percentage of males with this antibody. This could be due to the differences in the level of exposure of males and females to mosquito bites, as a result of the differences in clothing patterns between the sexes. In rural areas, men rarely cover the upper parts of their bodies, and they also engage in outdoor activities more, including “Chena” cultivation, which takes place in the midst of jungle areas. Therefore, men have a higher chance of exposure to the disease, over women who mainly engage in house hold activities away from insect-infested areas outdoors. Males have a high tendency of being exposed to the infection because of the reasons discussed above and could account for this observation. Ondigo et al. in 2014 reported that antibodies to P. falciparum antigens may vary by time since last exposure [31]. Furthermore, antibodies to MSP1-19 have long half lives once acquired in older age (compared to the younger age groups) [29, 35, 36]. The mean age of females in this study was 39.24 years, which was less than the mean age of the males (43.59 years) indicating that the female group is consisted of much younger individuals when compared to the male group. Thus, there is a higher chance for MSP1-19 to persist in males rather than in females, but in contrast, a similar percentage of seropositive males (77%) and females (76%) were observed for anti-AMA1_Pf. It is documented that the age has a lesser effect on the half life of anti-AMA1_Pf when compared to anti-MSP1-19_Pf [29], which might explain the compatible levels of seropositivity in AMA1_Pf between the sexes.

Differences in gender with regard to malaria immunity, malaria susceptibility and epidemiology have been documented by other investigators as well. Mendis et al. in 1990 made the same observation in an endemic population in Sri Lanka, where the incidence rate of malaria was significantly higher in males than females, especially in individuals aged 16–56 years. They concluded that the exposure to the disease among adults might be associated with occupational related movements, which further supports the observations made in this study [37]. In India, effects of exposure to the disease upon males were larger than those for females [38]. However, Giha et al. described that the effect upon gender may vary according to the season, locality, and other demographic characteristics of the populations in question [39].

Interestingly, the seropositivity for AMA1-Pf was higher when compared to that of MSP1-19_Pf in the female subpopulation within the study group, which is more apparent in Kurunegala in the district-level analysis. AMA1-Pf is apparently known to be highly immunogenic when compared to the MSP1-19 antigen of the P. falciparum parasite [29, 40]. Weiss et al. reported that increase of MSP1-19 specific memory B cells in P. falciparum infected individuals with age is lower than that of increase of AMA1 specific memory B cells, suggestive of an outcome based on repetition of exposure rather than a function of age [41]. Furthermore, Badu et al. in 2012 reported that highly immunogenic AMA1_Pf tend to saturate into detectable levels (by ELISA) even in low/moderate transmission settings compared to MSP1-19_Pf levels which needs repeated exposure for saturation [42]. Such reasons may explain the low MSP1-19_Pf seropositivity when compared to that of AMA1_Pf of the females, due to their presumed limited exposure to malaria based on behavioural habits. The predominantly female population within the study group in Kurunegala district (i.e. 86.8%) is likely to have influenced the overall seropositivity rates calculated for the district against each P. falciparum antigen. In contrast the percentage of females in the study population from Moneragala is relatively low (57.5%), hence has a lesser effect upon total seropositivity calculated for the district.

Furthermore, the differences in socio-demographic characteristics of the 2 populations could have an effect upon the differences of seropositivity seen between the 2 districts, where Kurunegala being a relatively more urban area, where a considerable proportion of the population lives near the town with lesser exposure to the disease. In contrast, Moneragala district is more a rural area, with males engaged in “Chena” cultivation amidst jungles exposed to higher risk of the disease. Therefore, the population of Moneragala district have a higher chance to repeated exposure of malaria leading to higher seropositivity rates for MSP1-19_Pf, compared to the population from Kurunegala district, where people with lesser exposure will indicate a higher proportion of seropositivity for AMA1_Pf (due to high immunogenicity), but not for MSP1-19_Pf. In addition, the differences in sub class, half life and the polymorphisms of the antibodies could have an effect upon this observation [42].

The seropositivity rates as well as the mean/median levels of antibodies were significantly higher in 3 out of 4 tested antibodies in the Moneragala district, when compared to those from the Kurunegala district. Both Moneragala and Kurunegala were considered as high malaria endemic areas 10 years ago when the burden of malaria was high (before the year 2000). Moneragala district is considered as a rural area with an annual parasitic incidence (API) of 0.1–0.9 in year 2010, when compared to Kurunegala district, which had an API of 0.01–0.09 during the same period [43]. This most probably, explains the higher seropositivity rates as well as the high means and medians of the tested antibodies in the Moneragala district when compared to Kurunegala district.

The highest correlation observed among the antibodies was between those against P. vivax antigens. This might be explained using malaria transmission dynamics that prevailed in Sri Lanka in the past, with P. vivax being the predominant causative agent for malaria in Sri Lanka, which may have an indirect effect on correlation, as the number of individuals who were infected with P. falciparum might be less compared to P. vivax. The correlation between antibodies is likely to be affected by the level of infection and also the age [22].

Five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) out of the selected host SNPs studied were associated with either the presence or absence of antibodies, and 3 SNPs with high antibody levels. These SNPs (or genes that contain them) have been previously implicated to be associated with immunity, disease severity and/or protection against malaria [44, 45]. Three of the SNPs, which were associated with the presence/absence of the antibodies (viz. seropositivity), were located in the C5ORF56 gene, and 1 SNP in IL5 gene. Two SNPs in the C5ORF56 gene (i.e. rs6874639 and rs2706381) and rs739718 in IL5 gene are intron-variants. Intron-variants are generally considered as variants that do not directly have an impact on gene regulation, but there is a possibility that they can enhance gene expression or affect splicing of mRNA [46, 47]. Greenwood et al. in 2003 reported of introns containing enhancer elements that are capable of increasing gene expression by 2-folds in human dopamine transfer gene [48]. In a recent study, an intron variant which is in HPSE gene was identified as a variant that is associated with SNP—dependent enhancer activity especially in malignancies [49]. Maiga et al. in 2013 also supports this observation where they reported the association between the same SNP (rs739718) and falciparum antibodies AMA1 and MSP1-19 [44]. On the other hand, the intron variants can be linked with another SNP that actually has an impact on the regulation of the gene.

The SNP rs2706379 overlaps 4 genes (i.e. C5ORF56, RF00019, AC116366.1 and C5ORF56AC116366.3), and 11 transcripts [50]. The major possible consequences of this SNP are listed as an intron variant (44%) and non-coding transcript variant (25%) and to a lesser extent as a missense variant within an exon which has the possibility of making a protein/amino acid change. The major impact of this SNP is stated as a “modifier” [50]. The importance of non-coding DNA in fundamental gene processes, i.e. gene regulation and 3D chromatin folding has been documented which in turn can affect gene regulation and gene expression [51].

Since the relationship of the gene C5ORF56 (previously known as LOC441108) with malaria susceptibility has been described before [52], rs2706379 was considered as a part of this gene. The base change of this variant is C>T, and in the case of acting as a missense variant the possible amino acid change is Ser>Pro. In this population the heterozygous (CT) individuals were significantly associated with seropositivity when compared to the homozygous individuals. Therefore, it could be speculated that these polymorphisms in this SNP might have an effect upon gene regulation, which might be important for immune responses. On the contrary, the SNP could also have an effect upon malaria susceptibility and/or resistance, which intern could affect the seropositivity.

Both C5ORF56 and IL5 genes are included in the 5q31–33 cytokine gene cluster. The 5q31–33 region contains genes that encode the T helper 2 type cytokines or cytokine receptors and these genes are considered as strong candidates for determining of severity of malaria [52]. Furthermore, Garcia et al. in 1998 and Flori et al. in 2003 suggested that genes located on chromosome 5q31–33 are important in the control of malaria blood infection levels [53, 54]. IL5 levels were also observed to be significantly high in mild malaria patients when compared to severe malaria or cerebral malaria patients who had low/intermediate levels of IL5 [55]. IL5 is expressed by eosinophils [56]. Eosinophils are responsible for the elimination of antibody bound parasites by releasing cytotoxic granule proteins [57] indicating the importance of polymorphisms of the IL5 gene in malaria infections.

NOD (Nucleotide binding Oligomerization Domain) proteins involving Nod like receptors have been identified as key host molecules in innate immune and inflammatory responses. Once stimulated by pathogens they activate the signaling pathways leading to activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [58]. Furthermore, up-regulation of Nod proteins upon exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to malaria sporozoites has been observed [59] and influence of Nod proteins on cytokine levels involving malaria pathogenesis, i.e. IFN-γ [60] supports the theory that alludes to the importance of genes that encode Nod Protein in malaria. The SNP rs2075820 in the NOD1 gene was previously reported as a polymorphism associated with clinical malaria in Mali [44]. In this study, it was found that rs2075820 (located in the NOD1 gene) is associated with seropositivity to both MSP1-19_Pf and AMA1_Pv. This particular SNP is a missense variant (C>T) with an ability of changing the amino acid by changing the transcription codon from GAG (Glu) to AAG (Lys), indicating that polymorphisms at this particular chromosomal position could alter the structure/function of the NOD protein, which ultimately might have an influence over immune responses to malaria. The SIFT score and the PolyPhen score reflects whether an amino acid substitution affects protein function. This variant however, has a SIFT score of 0.05 (amino acid change marginally tolerant) and a PolyPhen score of 0.266 (amino acid change tolerant) which indicates that the amino acid change due to the polymorphism has a limited effect upon the structure and/or function of the protein [50].

The SNP rs17411697, which is a missense variant (340 G>T), and is capable of altering the amino acid sequence (Ala>Ser) which has a SIFT score of 0.02 and a PolyPhen score of 0.637 indicating this amino acid change is deleterious and has a significant effect upon the protein In this study, it was evident that the heterozygotes of this SNP were significantly associated with higher levels of MSP1-19_Pv antibodies. A study done in Tanzania revealed that carriage of the T allele of the rs17411697 was associated with an increase risk of acidosis in severe malaria [45]. This marker is located in the IL1A gene, which encodes IL1 pyrogen. Walley et al. in 2004, who found significant associations between the variants of IL1A gene and severe malaria suggested that IL1 may have a role to play in inflammatory damage due to malaria parasites in the brain in cerebral malaria; thus concluding that variants of the IL1A gene may also be associated with cerebral malaria [61].

The SNP rs2227491 located in the IL22 gene was found to be associated with lower levels of AMA1_Pv antibodies with the homozygote individuals carrying the mutant allele (C) having significantly lower antibody levels. IL22 is produced mainly by activated Th1 cells and enhances the innate immunity, which activates a series of non-specific defense mechanisms immediately after a pathogen enters the body. It can be hypothesized that the polymorphisms in this marker may have significant effect on IL22 production, thus positively influencing the innate immune system with a resultant protective role against malaria infection in the host. Thus, individuals with the mutant allele (C) may have lower antibody levels due to their inherent protection against malaria infection. However, opposing views also have been expressed by others with the mutant allele (C) of this marker identified in association with susceptibility to malaria and the ancestral allele (T) in association with protection against severe disease [62]. Thus it can also be argued that the individuals with the mutant C allele tend to produce low levels of antibodies and might be more susceptible to malaria compared to the individuals carrying the ancestral T allele. Furthermore, since rs2227491 is an intron-variant the effect of this marker on antibody levels might also be due to linkage as well. Therefore, more advanced studies with serological, epidemiological and genetic data will be needed to make exact inferences on the effect of these alleles on malaria.

The SNP rs229587 had a marginally significant association with lower levels of AMA1_Pf antibodies. This marker is also an intron-variant, thus this effect upon the antibody levels could be due to other markers, which are in linkage with rs229587.

The main limitation of this study is the low number of study participants (n = 242) and low number of SNPs (n = 166) included, compared to the whole genome studies with larger populations, which adds more power to the genetic association analysis. However, the sample numbers and the number of SNPs studies had to be limited due to logistical reasons that prevailed during that time.

The majority of the study population was females. This might have an effect upon the results as significant associations between gender and antibody levels were observed within this population. However, appropriate statistical measures were taken to minimize these effects.

It is also noteworthy that a possible bias may exist towards the genetic analyses used in this study since the genetic variants explored are listed as candidate SNPs, which are associated with either severe and complicated or uncomplicated malaria and has been selected after extensive review of published data from MalariaGEN consortium [25]. Thus there is a possibility that these SNPs may exhibit an association with antibody levels or seropositivity, when actually the association of these tested SNPs might be with other aspects of malaria (e.g. disease severity). Although advanced statistical methods are available to minimize the effects of other confounding variables, absence of related data (such as data on parasitaemia, fever scores, disease severity) is a limitation.

Conclusion

The study suggests that several SNPs in the human genome that exist in Sri Lankan populations are significantly associated with anti-malarial antibodies, either with generation and/or maintenance of antibodies for longer periods, which can be due to either individual polymorphisms or most probably a combined effect of the markers. Further studies with larger study population size will be needed for confirmation of these observations. The levels of anti-malarial antibodies seem to be a result of repeated exposure to the disease, and influenced by age, gender and the malaria transmission pattern of the location.

References

  1. 1.

    WHO. World Malaria Report 2016. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2016. http://www.who.int/malaria. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.

  2. 2.

    WHO. WHO certifies Sri Lanka malaria-free. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2016. Available from: http://www.sero.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2016/1631/en. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.

  3. 3.

    Karunaweera ND, Galappaththy GN, Wirth DF. On the road to eliminate malaria in Sri Lanka: lessons from history, challenges, gaps in knowledge and research needs. Malar J. 2014;13:59.

  4. 4.

    WHO. World Malaria Report. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2013. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2013/wmr2013_country_profiles.pdf?ua=1.

  5. 5.

    Wijesundere D, Ramasamy R. Analysis of hisorical trends and recent elimination of malaria from Sri Lanka and its applicability for malaria control in other countries. Front Public Health. 2017;5:212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00212.

  6. 6.

    Akpogheneta O, Duah N, Tetteh K, Dunyo S, Lanar D, Pinder M, et al. Duration of naturally acquired antibody response to blood stage Plasmodium falciparum is age dependent and antigen specific. Infect Immun. 2008;76:1748–55.

  7. 7.

    Dewasurendra RL, Suriyaphol P, Fernando SD, Carter R, Rockett K, Corran PH, et al. Genetic polymorphisms associated with anti-malarial antibody levels in a low and unstable malaria transmission area in southern Sri Lanka. Malar J. 2012;11:281.

  8. 8.

    Siddiqui W, Tam LQ, Kramer KJ, Hui GS, Case SE, Yamaga KM, et al. Merozoite surface coat precursor protein completely protects Aotus monkeys against Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:3014–8.

  9. 9.

    Chappel JA, Holder AA. Monoclonal antibodies that inhibit Plasmodium falciparum invasion in vitro recognise the firstr growth factor-like domain of merozoite surface protein-1. Mol Biochem Parasit. 1993;60:303–11.

  10. 10.

    Daly TM, Long CA. A recombinant 15-kD carboxyl-terminal fragment of Plasmodium yoelii yoelii 17XL merozoite surface protein 1 induces a protective immune response in mice. Infect Immun. 1993;61:2462–7.

  11. 11.

    Branch OH, Udhayakumar V, Hightower AW, Oloo AJ, Hawley WA, Nahlen BL, et al. A longitudinal investigation of IgG and IgM antibody responses to the merozoite surface protein-1 19 kD domain of Plasmodium falciparum in pregnant women and infants: associations with febrite illness, parasitemia and anemia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:211–9.

  12. 12.

    Egan AF, Morris J, Barnish G, Allen S, Greenwood BM, Kaslow DC, et al. Clinical immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria is associated with serum antibodies to the 19-kDa C-terminal fragment of the merozoite surface antigen, PfMSP-1. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:765–9.

  13. 13.

    Osier FHA, Fegan G, Polley SD, Murungi L, Verra F, Tetteh KKA, et al. Breadth and magnitude of antibody responses to multiple Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens are associated with protection from clinical malaria. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2240–8.

  14. 14.

    Riley E, Allen S, Wheeler J, Blackman M, Bennett S, Takacs B, et al. Naturally aquired cellular and humoral immune response to the major merozoite surface antigen (PfMSP1) of Plasmodium falciparum are associated with reduced malaria morbidity. Parasite Immunol. 1992;14:321–37.

  15. 15.

    Remarque EJ, Faber BW, Kocken CHM, Thomas AW. Apical membrane antigen-1: a malaria vaccine candidate in review. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:74–84.

  16. 16.

    MacRaild CS, Anders RF, Foley M, Norton RS. Apical membrane antigen-1 as an anti-malarial drug target. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11:2039–47.

  17. 17.

    Dodoo D, Aikins A, Kusi KA, Lamptey H, Remarque E, Milligan P, et al. Cohort study of the association of antibody levels to AMA1, MSP119, MSP3 and GLURP with protection from clinical malaria in Ghanaian children. Malar J. 2008;7:142.

  18. 18.

    Nebie I, Diarra A, Ouedraogo A, Soulama I, Bougouma EC, Tiono AB, et al. Humoral response to Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigens and association with incidence of clincal malaria in children living in an area of seasonal malaria transmission in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Infect Immun. 2008;76:759–66.

  19. 19.

    Sjoberg K, Lepers J, Raharimalala L, Larsson A, Olerup O, Marbiah N, et al. Genetic regulation of human anti-malarial antiboies in twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:2101–4.

  20. 20.

    Luoni G, Verra F, Arca B, Sirima BS, Troye-Blomberg M, Coluzzi M, et al. Antimalarial antibody levels and IL4 polymorphism in the Fulani of West Africa. Genes Immun. 2001;2:411–4.

  21. 21.

    Afridi S, Atkinson A, Garnier S, Fumoux F, Rihet P. Malaria resistance genes are associated with the levels of IgG subclasses directed against Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigens in Burkina Faso. Malar J. 2012;11:308.

  22. 22.

    Shelton J, Corran P, Kwiatkowski D, Karunaweera N, Dewasurendra RL. MalariaGEN. Genetic determinants of anti-malarial acquired immunity in a large multi-centre study. Malar J. 2015;14:333.

  23. 23.

    Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka. 2011. http://www.statistics.gov.lk/.

  24. 24.

    Dewasurendra RL, Dias JN, Sepulveda N, Gunawardena GSA, Chandrasekharan N, Drakeley C, et al. Effectiveness of a serological tool to predict malaria transmission intensity in an elimination setting. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:49.

  25. 25.

    MalariaGEN. Malaria Genomic Epidemiology Network. 2007. http://www.malariagen.net/ Accessed 1 Feb 2018.

  26. 26.

    Zhang L, Cui X, Schmitt K, Hubert R, Navidi W, Arnheim N. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5847–51.

  27. 27.

    Barrett J, Fry B, Maller J, Daly M. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263–5.

  28. 28.

    Gabriel S, Schaffner S, Nguyen H, Moor J, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002;296:2225–9.

  29. 29.

    Drakeley C, Corran PH, Coleman P, Tongren JE, McDonald SLR, Carneiro I, et al. Estimating medium and long term trends in malaria transmission by using serological markers of malaria exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:5108–13.

  30. 30.

    Warren M, Collins W, Jeffery G, Skinner J. The seroepidemiology of malaria in Middle America II. Studies on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1975;24:749–54.

  31. 31.

    Ondigo B, Hodges JS, Ireland KF, Magak NG, Lanar DE, Datta S, et al. Estimation of recent and long-term malaria transmission in a population by antibody testing to multiple Plasmodium falciparum antigens. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:1123–32.

  32. 32.

    Warren M, Collins W, Cedillos R, Jeffery G. The seroepidemiology of malaria in Middle America III. Serologic assessment of localized Plasmodium falciparum epidemics. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1976;25:20–5.

  33. 33.

    Manz R, Hauser A, Redbruch A. Maintenance of serum antibody levels. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:367–86.

  34. 34.

    Druilhe P, Pradier O, Marc JP, Miltgen F, Mazier D, Parent G. Levels of antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite surface antigens reflect malaria transmission rates and are persistent in the absence of reinfection. Infect Immun. 1986;53:393–7.

  35. 35.

    Noland G, Hendle-Paterson B, Min X, Morrmann A, Vulule J, Narum D, et al. Low prevalence of antibodies to pre-erythrocytic but not blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens in an area of unstable malaria transmission compared to prevalence in an area of stable malaria transmission. Infect Immun. 2008;76:5721–8.

  36. 36.

    Kinyanjui S, Convey D, Lanar D, Marsh K. IgG antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antgens in Kenyan children have a short half-life. Malar J. 2007;6:82.

  37. 37.

    Mendis C, Gamage-Mendis AC, De Zoysa APK, Abhayawardena TA, Carter R, Herath PRJ, et al. Characteristics of malaria transmission in Kataragama, Sri Lanka: a focus for immuno-epidemiological studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;42:298–308.

  38. 38.

    Cutler D, Fung W, Krener M, Singhal M, Vogl T. Early life malaria exposure and adult outcomes: evidence from malaria eradication in India. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2010;2:72–94.

  39. 39.

    Giha HA, Rosthoj S, Dodoo D, Haviid L, Satti GMH, Arnot DA, et al. The epidemiology of febrile malaria episodes in an area of unstable and seasonal transmission. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000;94:645–51.

  40. 40.

    Tongren JE, Drakeley CJ, McDonald SLR, Reyburn HG, Manjurano A, Nkya WMM, et al. Target antigen, age, and duration of antigen exposure independently regulate immunoglobulin G subclass switching in malaria. Infect Immun. 2006;74:257–64.

  41. 41.

    Weiss GE, Traore B, Kayentao K, Ongoiba A, Doumbo S, Doumtabe D, et al. The Plasmodium falciparum-specific human memory b cell compartment expands gradually with repeated malaria infections. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000912.

  42. 42.

    Badu K, Afrane YA, Labri J, Stewart VA, Waitumbi J, Angov E, et al. Marked variation in MSP-119 antibody responses to malaria in western Kenyan highlands. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:50.

  43. 43.

    Premaratna R, Galappaththy G, Chandrasena N, Fernando R, Nawasiwatte T, de Silva N, et al. Clinicians who practice in countries reaching malaria elimination, what should they be aware of: lessons learnt from recent experience in Sri Lanka. Malar J. 2011;10:302.

  44. 44.

    Maiga B, Dolo A, Toure O, Dara V, Tapily A, Campino S, et al. Human candidate polymorphisms in sympatric ethnic groups dirrering in malaria susceptibility in Mali. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75675.

  45. 45.

    Manjurano A, Clark T, Nadjm B, Mtove G, Wangal H, Sepulveda N, et al. Candidate human genetic polymorphisms and severe malaria in a Tanzanian population. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47463.

  46. 46.

    Pagani F, Baralle F. Genomic variants in exons and introns: identifying the splicing spoilers. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:289–396.

  47. 47.

    Cooper D. Functional intronic polymorphisms: buried treasure awaiting discovery within our genes. Hum Genomics. 2010;4:284–8.

  48. 48.

    Greenwood TA, Kelsoe JR. Promotor and intronic variants affect the transcriptional regulation of the human dopamine transporter gene. Genomics. 2003;82:511–20.

  49. 49.

    Ostrovsky O, Grushchenko-Polaq AV, Beider K, Mayorov M, Canaani J, Shimoni A, et al. Identification of strong intron enhancer in the heparanase gene: effect of functional rs4693608 variant on HPSE enhancer actibity in hematological and solid malignancies. Oncogenesis. 2018;7:51.

  50. 50.

    Zerbino DR, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Amode MR, Barrell D, Bhai J, et al. Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D754–61.

  51. 51.

    Spielmann M, Mundlos S. Looking beyond the genes: the role of non-coding variants in human disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:R157–65.

  52. 52.

    Naka I, Nishida N, Patarapotikul J, Nuchnoi P, Tokunaga K, Hananantachai H, et al. Identification of a haplotype block in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster associated with the susceptibility to severe malaria. Malar J. 2009;8:232.

  53. 53.

    Garcia A, Marquet S, Bucheton B, Hillaire D, Cot M, Fievet N, et al. Linkage analysis of blood Plasmodium falciparum levels: interest of the 5q31–q33 chromosome region. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;58:705–9.

  54. 54.

    Flori L, Kumulungui B, Aucan C, Esnault C, Traore A, Fumoux F, et al. Linkage and association between Plasmodium falciparum blood infection levels and chromosome 5q31–q33. Genes Immun. 2003;4:265–8.

  55. 55.

    Prakash D, Fesel C, Jain R, Cazenave P, Mishra G, Pied S. Clusters of cytokines determine malaria severity in Plasmodium falciparum infected patients from endemic areas of central India. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:198–207.

  56. 56.

    Dubucquoi S, Desreumaux P, Janin A, Klein O, Goldman M, Tavernier J, et al. Interleukin 5 synthesis by eosinophils: association with granules and immunoglobulin-dependent secretion. J Exp Med. 1994;179:703–8.

  57. 57.

    Giembycz MA, Lindsay M. Pharmocology of the eosinophil. Pharmocol Rev. 1999;51:216–339.

  58. 58.

    Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell. 2006;124:783–801.

  59. 59.

    Ockenhouse C, Hu W, Kester K, Cummings J, Stewart A, Heppner D, et al. Common and divergent immune response signaling pathways discovered in peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression patterns in presymptomatic and clinically apparent malaria. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5561–73.

  60. 60.

    Finney C, Lu Z, LeBourhis L, Philpott D, Kain K. Disruption of nod-like receptors alters inflammatory response to infection but does not confer protection in experimental cerebral malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:718–22.

  61. 61.

    Walley A, Aucan C, Kwiatkowski D, Hill A. Interleukin-1 gene cluster polymorphisms and susceptibility to clinical malaria in a Gambian case-control study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:132–8.

  62. 62.

    Koch O, Rockett K, Jallow M, Pinder M, Sisay-Joof F, Kwiatkowski D. Investigation of malaria susceptibility determinants in the IFNG/IL26/IL22 genomic region. Genes Immun. 2005;6:312–8.

Download references

Authors’ contributions

RLD contributed in designing the project, sample collection, ELISA, analysing data and drafting the manuscript. AJ contributed in genotyping and analysing the samples, NC, KR and DK contributed in critical review on lab protocols and the manuscript SAG and NDK contributed in overall supervision project and revision of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the technical assistance provided by the staff of the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka and the staff of the Malaria Research Station, Mailagama, Kataragama, Sri Lanka. Ed Remarque of Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswick, The Netherlands is greatly acknowledged for providing malaria Antigen AMA1 falciparum/vivax for the ELISAs. Staff of Kuliyapitiya Base Hospital, Narammala District Hospital, Katupotha District Hospital, Weerambugedara Medical Officer of Health [MOH] office, Rideegama MOH office, Polpithigama MOH office, Kataragama MOH office and M.R.S.S. Bandara, Regional Malaria Officer (Kurunegala) are acknowledged for their support in sample collection.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka (Ref# EC/11/191). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before enrolling to the study. Consent for children (under 18 years) was obtained from their parents or guardian.

Funding

This study was funded by World Class University Research Grants 2012.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Correspondence to Nadira D. Karunaweera.

Additional files

12936_2018_2622_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Additional file 1. List of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms [SNPs] genotyped.

12936_2018_2622_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Additional file 2. Comparison of median antibody levels between the districts.

12936_2018_2622_MOESM3_ESM.docx

Additional file 3. Frequency distribution of the antibodies in the study population and in each age group for the tested antibodies.

12936_2018_2622_MOESM4_ESM.docx

Additional file 4. Minor allele frequencies of the SNPs significantly associated with presence of antibodies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dewasurendra, R.L., Jeffreys, A., Gunawardena, S.A. et al. Host genetic polymorphisms and serological response against malaria in a selected population in Sri Lanka. Malar J 17, 473 (2018) doi:10.1186/s12936-018-2622-9

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.